United States v. Mitchell Chandler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202121-30136California228 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30136

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:20-cr-00124-SPW-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MITCHELL JAMES CHANDLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Mitchell James Chandler appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the ten-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

escape, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Chandler’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). grounds for relief, along with a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.