United States v. Justin Gladding

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202121-10005California229 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10005

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00265-DAD-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JUSTIN PAUL GLADDING,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Justin Paul Gladding appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 4-month custodial sentence and 96-month term of supervised

release imposed following the court’s revocation of supervision. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gladding’s counsel has filed a brief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). stating that there are no grounds for relief, along…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.