Cdcr

Timothy Wilkins v. Cdcr

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202120-55805California276 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

OCT 18 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY DEANORE WILKINS, No. 20-55805

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-09116-VAP-E

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Timothy Deanore Wilkins appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Albino

v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.