Kevin Allen v. S. Rimbach
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202121-15203California295 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
OCT 18 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KEVIN ALLEN, No. 21-15203
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-01653-DAD-SAB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
S. RIMBACH; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Kevin Allen appeals pro se from the district court’s
summary judgment in his discrimination action alleging violations of Title II of the
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo. Wong v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 410 F.3d 1052,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1063 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.