Katherine Whitney v. City of Tacoma

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202120-35106California1,171 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KATHERINE LOUISE WHITNEY, No. 20-35106

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-05582-BHS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF TACOMA, a municipal entity; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 14, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Whitney appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claims brought

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several state and local government officials in

Washington State, and several employees of Share & Care House, a private, non-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). profit organization that helps to administer rental assistance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.