James Griepsma v. Christian Andersen
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202120-35948California654 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES DAVID GRIEPSMA, No. 20-35948
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00181-RSM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CHRISTIAN J. ANDERSEN; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
James David Griepsma appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising
from his pretrial detention. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo. Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2018). We affirm.