James Griepsma v. Christian Andersen

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202120-35948California654 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES DAVID GRIEPSMA, No. 20-35948

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00181-RSM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHRISTIAN J. ANDERSEN; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

James David Griepsma appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising

from his pretrial detention. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2018). We affirm.

The district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.