Debra Legris v. Capistrano Unified Sch. Dist.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202120-56261California1,533 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 18 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEBRA LEGRIS; AVIANA LEGRIS, No. 20-56261

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-00837-DOC-ADS v.

CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL MEMORANDUM*

DISTRICT, a local educational agency,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 6, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, CHRISTEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Aviana Legris and her mother, Debra Legris, appeal the district court’s order

affirming the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) decision that Aviana did not qualify

for special-education services during high school pursuant to the Individuals with

Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. The Legrises also

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. appeal the district court’s conclusion that Capistrano did not violate its Child…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.