Amana Global Company v. King County
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMANA GLOBAL COMPANY, a sole No. 21-35537 proprietorship company; HAFID TAHRAOUI, an individual, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00637-RSM
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
KING COUNTY, a charter county of the State of Washington; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Hafid Tahraoui1 appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Appellant Amana Global Company is represented by appellant Tahraoui in his pro se capacity (appellants are collectively referred to herein as “Tahraoui”). See…