Amana Global Company v. King County

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202121-35537California387 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMANA GLOBAL COMPANY, a sole No. 21-35537 proprietorship company; HAFID TAHRAOUI, an individual, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00637-RSM

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

KING COUNTY, a charter county of the State of Washington; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Hafid Tahraoui1 appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Appellant Amana Global Company is represented by appellant Tahraoui in his pro se capacity (appellants are collectively referred to herein as “Tahraoui”). See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.