Tricoast Builders v. Frederick CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 2021B307825California3,071 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 10/18/21 Tricoast Builders v. Frederick CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

TRICOAST BUILDERS, INC. 2d Civ. No. B307825 et al., (Super. Ct. No. 56-2017- 00496775-CU-BC-VTA) Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Ventura County)

v.

KELLY A. FREDERICK et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

The parties settled this construction defect case at a mandatory settlement conference (MSC) and placed the settlement terms on the record. The parties agreed on the record that the settlement terms would be memorialized in a fully executed agreement prior to payment of the settlement amounts. Michael Connette, both individually and as a principal of Tricoast Builders,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.