Patterson
Patterson v. Superior Court
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 10/18/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
MICHAEL PATTERSON, B312411
Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 20STCV14987) v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
Respondent;
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. et al.,
Real Parties in Interest.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS in mandate. Malcolm Mackey, Judge. Petition granted. Kyle Todd, P.C., Kyle Todd, Samantha Johnson and Alfredo Nava. No appearance for Respondent. Hill, Farrer & Burrill, James Bowles and Casey Morris for Real Parties in Interest Charter Communications, Inc. and Nicholas Lopez. ______________________
Several well-established rules govern imposition of fees and costs incurred in actions under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.). First, a successful plaintiff is entitled to recover his or her reasonable attorney fees. A prevailing defendant, however, may not be awarded attorney fees or costs “unless the court finds the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless when brought, or the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so.”…