Lacy

Crestwood Behavioral Health v. Lacy

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 19, 2021A158830California9,041 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Crestwood is a provider of mental health services. Lacy worked in Crestwood’s San Francisco facility as a recovery coach. When Lacy joined Crestwood, she signed and agreed to Crestwood’s “Dispute Resolution & Arbitration” policy (arbitration policy). Under that policy, “Crestwood, as well as every employee of Crestwood, agree to submit unresolved employment-related legal disputes to an impartial, objective individual called an arbitrator. . . . [¶] Arbitration is agreed to in lieu of a civil action before a judge or jury, and the arbitrator’s decision is final and binding.” (Some underlining omitted.) Crestwood terminated Lacy after she allegedly complained to a co- worker about being assaulted on the job. On January 7, 2019, Lacy filed a retaliation complaint against Crestwood with the Labor Commissioner. The Commissioner accepted the complaint and began an investigation pursuant 2 to section 98.7, subdivision (a). On January 22, 2019, the Commissioner sent a letter, notifying Crestwood of Lacy’s complaint and the Commissioner’s investigation of that complaint. After contacting Lacy and her attorney to inform them of its intent to arbitrate, Crestwood also informed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.