United States v. Daniel Nix
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202121-30085California356 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30085
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00105-RSL-
v.
DANIEL A. NIX, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Daniel A. Nix appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion for reconsideration of its order denying as unexhausted Nix’s motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Nix contends that the district court erred in treating…