United States v. Daniel Nix

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202121-30085California356 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30085

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00105-RSL-

v.

DANIEL A. NIX, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Daniel A. Nix appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion for reconsideration of its order denying as unexhausted Nix’s motion for

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Nix contends that the district court erred in treating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.