United States v. Charles Foster
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202121-10102California343 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10102
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00219-DKW-
v.
CHARLES H. FOSTER, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Derrick Kahala Watson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Charles H. Foster appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion
for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Foster contends that the district court failed to conduct a “holistic inquiry”
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). when evaluating his compassionate release motion…