United States v. Charles Foster

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202121-10102California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10102

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00219-DKW-

v.

CHARLES H. FOSTER, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Derrick Kahala Watson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Charles H. Foster appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Foster contends that the district court failed to conduct a “holistic inquiry”

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). when evaluating his compassionate release motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.