Travis Warren v. Ole Hansen

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202120-35053California441 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TRAVIS DAVID WARREN, No. 20-35053

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:18-cv-00329-YY

v.

MEMORANDUM*

OLE HANSEN; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

LANE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Youlee Yim You, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted October 12, 2021***

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Travis David Warren appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his

serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.