Steven Iglesias v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202120-70377California934 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN MANUEL IGLESIAS, AKA No. 20-70377 Steven Acosta, AKA Steven M. Iglesias Acosta, AKA Steven Iglesias, AKA Steven Agency No. A094-304-583 Iglesias Acosta, AKA Steven M. Iglesias Acosta,

MEMORANDUM*

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Steven Manuel Iglesias, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his request to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). terminate and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision

finding him removable, denying his prior motion to terminate,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.