Roxanne Tunison v. Safeco Ins. Company of Il.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202120-36017California1,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROXANNE TUNISON; et al., No. 20-36017

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00503-RSL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF

ILLINOIS, a foreign corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 4, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: TASHIMA, M. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Elias, Jon, and Roxanne Tunison appeal the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois (“Safeco”).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing the district court’s grant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of summary judgment de novo, Bravo v. City of Santa Maria, 665 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.