Kenneth Hill v. Scott Kernan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202119-16759California490 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH HILL, No. 19-16759

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01108-TLN-CKD

and

MEMORANDUM*

SHAWN KEVIN FROST, Sr.; et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SCOTT KERNAN; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Kenneth Hill appeals pro se from the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to

his serious medical needs and safety. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.