Elhadji Toure v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202120-70369California944 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELHADJI OMAR TOURE, Nos. 20-70369 20-72920 Petitioner, Agency No. A209-169-468 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 2, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, CALLAHAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN

Petitioner Elhadji Omar Toure, a native and citizen of Senegal, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) orders (1) dismissing his

appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal,

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”); and (2) denying his

motion to reopen. Toure’s first petition (No. 20-70369) challenges the agency’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. adverse credibility determination and its denial of CAT relief. The second petition

(No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.