Dougal Samuels v. Pam Ahlin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202119-17419California360 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOUGAL SAMUELS, No. 19-17419

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00585-DAD-EPG

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAM AHLIN, Director, Coalinga State Hospital; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH;

PETER BRESLER, Doctor; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). California civil detainee Dougal Samuels appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state

law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse

of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.