Alejandro Rodriguez v. William Barr

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 202120-55770California607 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ; et al., No. 20-55770

Petitioners-Appellees, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-03239-TJH-RNB v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; et MEMORANDUM* al.,

Respondents-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and HADDON,*** District Judge.

The United States appeals the district court’s order refusing to dissolve the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sam E. Haddon, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. permanent injunction previously entered despite the subsequent vacatur of the

underlying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.