Alejandro Rodriguez v. William Barr
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ; et al., No. 20-55770
Petitioners-Appellees, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-03239-TJH-RNB v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; et MEMORANDUM* al.,
Respondents-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 15, 2021** Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and HADDON,*** District Judge.
The United States appeals the district court’s order refusing to dissolve the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sam E. Haddon, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. permanent injunction previously entered despite the subsequent vacatur of the
underlying…