Doe

Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 19, 2021A159023California7,409 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/30/21; Certified for publication 10/19/21 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A159023

v. THE REGENTS OF THE (Alameda County UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Super. Ct. No. HG18897877) Defendant and Respondent.

John Doe was a senior at University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB), when fellow student Jane Roe reported that he engaged in dating violence against her in violation of University of California policy. John admitted that, after arguing with Jane for hours, he “grabbed her, screamed in her face and shook her” and “eventually dragged her out of the bed to the front door” of his home. Following an investigation, the university found John violated UC policy, and he was suspended for three years, resulting in a three-year hold of his degree and diploma. John petitioned for a writ of administrative mandate seeking to set aside the disciplinary decision and suspension, and the trial court denied the petition. In this appeal, John contends UCSB failed to provide a fair process and the factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.