People v. Painia CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2021B301726ACalifornia7,409 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

Filed 10/20/21 P. v. Painia CA2/4 Opinion after recalling remittitur

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE, B301726

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA468072) v.

MANUEL PAINIA

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David V. Herriford, Judge. Affirmed. Lori A. Nakaoka, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Noah P. Hill and Nima Razfar, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Dissatisfied with repairs performed on his vehicle,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.