United States v. Ross Farca

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-10184California855 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10184

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:19-cr-00643-JST-1 v.

ROSS ANTHONY FARCA, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 18, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS,*** District Judge.

Ross Anthony Farca (“Farca”) appeals an order requiring him to pay

restitution to the United States Army (“Army”) after pleading guilty to making a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William K. Sessions III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. false statement to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.