United States v. Daneil Wilson, II

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-10030California546 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10030

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-08298-GMS-

v.

DANEIL FRANCIS WILSON II, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Daneil Francis Wilson II appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 252-month sentence and a standard

condition of supervised release imposed for ten counts involving kidnapping and

assault, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a), 1153, and 1201. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.