United States v. Bryan Haskell

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202121-30012California327 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30012

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:17-cr-00079-BLW-

v.

BRYAN MICHAEL HASKELL, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Bryan Michael Haskell appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 14-month sentence imposed upon his second revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Haskell contends that the district court violated his right to due process at

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sentencing by relying on materially false…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.