United States v. Bryan Haskell
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202121-30012California327 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30012
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:17-cr-00079-BLW-
v.
BRYAN MICHAEL HASKELL, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Bryan Michael Haskell appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 14-month sentence imposed upon his second revocation of
supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Haskell contends that the district court violated his right to due process at
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sentencing by relying on materially false…