United States v. Amador Mendoza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202121-30038California287 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30038

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00181-WFN-

v.

AMADOR SANCHEZ MENDOZA, AKA MEMORANDUM*

Amador Sanchez,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Amador Sanchez Mendoza appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

We dismiss Mendoza’s appeal as untimely.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court entered its order denying Mendoza’s motion for

compassionate release on December 14, 2020.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.