Steve Wilson Briggs v. James Cameron

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-17229California444 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVE K. WILSON BRIGGS, No. 20-17229

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01596-VC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMES CAMERON; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges

Steve K. Wilson Briggs appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging copyright infringement and other related claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

dismissal for failure to state a claim. Wilson v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1083, 1090 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.