Steve Wilson Briggs v. James Cameron
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-17229California444 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVE K. WILSON BRIGGS, No. 20-17229
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01596-VC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JAMES CAMERON; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges
Steve K. Wilson Briggs appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging copyright infringement and other related claims. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s
dismissal for failure to state a claim. Wilson v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1083, 1090 (9th
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir. 2016). We affirm.