Jones

Sir Giorgio Clardy v. Jones

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-36056California283 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY, No. 20-36056

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01241-CL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JONES; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Oregon state prisoner Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and equal protection claims.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Williams v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.