Rush Spinks, Jr. v. E. Lopez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202121-15007California548 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

OCT 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUSH SPINKS, Jr., No. 21-15007

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:10-cv-01886-AWI-SKO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

E. LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

T. LAU; C. SCHUTT,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Rush Spinks, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his

serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

for an abuse of discretion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.