Rush Spinks, Jr. v. E. Lopez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202121-15007California548 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
OCT 20 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUSH SPINKS, Jr., No. 21-15007
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:10-cv-01886-AWI-SKO
v.
MEMORANDUM*
E. LOPEZ,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
T. LAU; C. SCHUTT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Rush Spinks, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his
serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review
for an abuse of discretion.…