Hull

Percy Hill v. Hull

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-16554California323 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PERCY EDWIN HILL, AKA Percy Hill, No. 20-16554

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08017-SPL-MTM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

HULL, First Name Unknown; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

MOHAVE COUNTY ADULT

DETENTION FACILITY; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Former pretrial detainee Percy Edwin Hill appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §1983 action challenging the conditions

of his confinement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.