Hull
Percy Hill v. Hull
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-16554California323 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PERCY EDWIN HILL, AKA Percy Hill, No. 20-16554
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08017-SPL-MTM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
HULL, First Name Unknown; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
MOHAVE COUNTY ADULT
DETENTION FACILITY; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Former pretrial detainee Percy Edwin Hill appeals pro se from the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §1983 action challenging the conditions
of his confinement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de
novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for…