Nicholas Patrick v. Orange Counrty Sheriffs Dep.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-55754California389 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NICHOLAS PATRICK, No. 20-55754
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:16-cv-00318-PLA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Paul L. Abrams, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted October 12, 2021***
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Nicholas Patrick appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment
for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). alleging excessive force and sexual harassment while he was detained at the