Melchor Limpin v. Robert McSeveney

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-55866California426 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

OCT 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN, No. 20-55866

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02351-AJB-BLM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT McSEVENEY, Immigration Judge; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Melchor Karl T. Limpin appeals pro se from the district court’s order

dismissing his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), arising from his arrest and

detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.