Leo Kramer v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank Na
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-15095California485 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEO KRAMER; AUDREY E. KRAMER, No. 20-15095
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00001-MMD-
WGC
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Leo and Audrey E. Kramer appeal pro se from the district court’s order
denying their motion for reconsideration in their action arising from foreclosure
proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an
abuse of discretion a denial of a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. The Kramers’ request for oral argument, set forth in their…