Leo Kramer v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank Na

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-15095California485 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEO KRAMER; AUDREY E. KRAMER, No. 20-15095

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00001-MMD-

WGC

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Leo and Audrey E. Kramer appeal pro se from the district court’s order

denying their motion for reconsideration in their action arising from foreclosure

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an

abuse of discretion a denial of a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. The Kramers’ request for oral argument, set forth in their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.