Jerome Bearden v. County of Alameda
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-16508California417 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
OCT 20 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEROME A. BEARDEN, No. 20-16508
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-04264-SI
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Jerome A. Bearden appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 action alleging various claims. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Colony Cove Props., LLC v. City of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Carson, 640 F.3d 948, 955 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.