Jerome Bearden v. County of Alameda

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-16508California417 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

OCT 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEROME A. BEARDEN, No. 20-16508

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-04264-SI

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Jerome A. Bearden appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 action alleging various claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Colony Cove Props., LLC v. City of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Carson, 640 F.3d 948, 955 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.