James Constant v. Southern California Edison Co.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

OCT 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES CONSTANT, No. 20-56179

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-06700-JFW-KES

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

James Constant appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 action alleging various claims arising from

eminent domain cases against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the basis of res judicata. Mpoyo v. Litton…