Shelton

Casey Hoyle v. Shelton

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202119-36011California479 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CASEY MICHAEL HOYLE, No. 19-36011

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-01800-MK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SHELTON, Doctor; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

JOHN DOE, Doctor,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Oregon state prisoner Casey Michael Hoyle appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056

(9th Cir. 2004). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.