Shelton
Casey Hoyle v. Shelton
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CASEY MICHAEL HOYLE, No. 19-36011
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-01800-MK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SHELTON, Doctor; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
JOHN DOE, Doctor,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Oregon state prisoner Casey Michael Hoyle appeals pro se from the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate
indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056
(9th Cir. 2004). We…