Anthony Smith v. Parole Board
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-17474California286 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY X. SMITH, No. 20-17474
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02454-TLN-DB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAROLE BOARD, at High Desert State Prison; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Anthony X. Smith appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing for failure to comply with a court order his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…