Anthony Smith v. Parole Board

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-17474California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY X. SMITH, No. 20-17474

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02454-TLN-DB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAROLE BOARD, at High Desert State Prison; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Anthony X. Smith appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing for failure to comply with a court order his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.