Park

Park v. Nazari CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2021B306648California1,955 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lavin, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendants and appellants Kelly Nazari, Shahrokh Nazari, and Shawn Nazari (Nazari defendants) appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motion to set aside judgments entered against them in 2013 and 2017. The Nazari defendants argue that the judgments are void because one of the plaintiffs in the case, True World, a limited liability company (True World), was dissolved in 2011. Accordingly, they argue the court erred by failing to set aside the judgments under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d), or under the court’s inherent equitable power. We conclude, as the court did, that the Nazari defendants fail to establish that the judgments are void. Accordingly, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Because the facts necessary to our decision are limited, we provide only a brief summary of the proceedings below. Plaintiff and respondent Chop Won Park initiated the present lawsuit against the Nazari defendants and others in September 2009. (Super. Ct. L.A. County, No. BC422025.) An amended complaint filed in July 2010 added True World as a plaintiff. A jury trial took place in 2013. The jury found for plaintiffs and concluded that True…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.