In re A.P. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
In this juvenile dependency case, the parents were also involved in an ongoing
child custody battle in the family court over their teenage girls, L.P. and A.P. (born in
2006 and 2007, respectively). San Bernardino County Children and Family Services 1 (CFS) filed this case under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a)
and (b) (petition), because G.C. (Mother) absconded with the children in violation of
family court orders awarding A.P., Sr. (Father) sole legal and physical custody, and
ordering her to return the children to him. In addition, the girls made child abuse
accusations against Father and his girlfriend, which the court and CFS later determined
were false.
The juvenile court found jurisdiction and ordered the girls removed from Mother
and returned to Father’s custody. The court then terminated jurisdiction, denied Mother’s
request for custody under section 361.2, issued family law exit orders addressing custody
and visitation, dismissed the case, and entered a final judgment. Mother appeals from the 2 orders and judgment.
1 Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions…