Abhari

Abhari v. Park CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 21, 2021B303806California4,225 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/21/21 Abhari v. Park CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

ZIA ABHARI, B303806

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 19STCV13986)

HEESOK PARK et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard L. Fruin, Judge. Affirmed. Christopher Weston; and Zia Abhari, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Park & Lim, Jessie Y. Kim and Dennis McPhillips for Defendants and Respondents Heesok Park, S. Young Lim and Dennis McPhillips. __________________________ Zia Abhari, representing himself as he did in the trial court,1 appeals from the order of dismissal entered after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.