Williams Rodriguez v. A. Rodriguez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202120-55929California261 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ, No. 20-55929
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-01168-DSF-RAO
v.
MEMORANDUM*
A. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Lieutenant,
individual; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Former California state prisoner Williams Rodriguez appeals pro se from the
district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for
relief from judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference
to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…