Williams Rodriguez v. A. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202120-55929California261 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAMS RODRIGUEZ, No. 20-55929

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-01168-DSF-RAO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

A. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Lieutenant,

individual; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Williams Rodriguez appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for

relief from judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference

to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.