William Holdner v. Richard Krietzberg
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM F. HOLDNER, No. 20-35565
Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00307-MO
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RICHARD A. KRIETZBERG; et al.,
Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
William F. Holdner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing in part and affirming in part his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s
order dismissing claims in his adversary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In his opening brief, Holdner fails to address how the district court erred by
dismissing Holdner’s…