William Holdner v. Richard Krietzberg

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202120-35565California280 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM F. HOLDNER, No. 20-35565

Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00307-MO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RICHARD A. KRIETZBERG; et al.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

William F. Holdner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing in part and affirming in part his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s

order dismissing claims in his adversary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In his opening brief, Holdner fails to address how the district court erred by

dismissing Holdner’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.