United States v. Tineimalo Adkins

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202121-10083California455 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10083

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00860-LEK-

v.

TINEIMALO ADKINS, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Tineimalo Adkins appeals from the district court’s orders denying his

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and

subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We need not address the parties’ arguments regarding exhaustion because,

even if the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.