United States v. Raymond Shryock
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202121-50038California371 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50038
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:95-cr-00345-RSWL-
v.
RAYMOND SHRYOCK, AKA Huero Shy, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Raymond Shryock appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Shryock contends that the district court should have granted his motion
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). given his age, poor health, family circumstances,…