United States v. Raymond Shryock

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202121-50038California371 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50038

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:95-cr-00345-RSWL-

v.

RAYMOND SHRYOCK, AKA Huero Shy, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Shryock appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Shryock contends that the district court should have granted his motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). given his age, poor health, family circumstances,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.