State of Hawaii v. Robert Stone, II

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202121-15210California422 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF HAWAII, by its Office of No. 21-15210 Consumer Protection, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00272-DKW-RT Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT L. STONE II, Esquire, DBA Gah Law Group, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

CYNTHIA A. STONE,

Defendant,

CHESTER NOEL ABING; et al.,

Intervenor-Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Derrick Kahala Watson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 12, 2021* Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Robert L. Stone II appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in this action filed by The State of Hawaii’s Office of Consumer

Protection (“OCP”) alleging Stone violated various federal and Hawaii consumer

protection laws. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. Lindsey v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.