Ricky Ray v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICKY RAY, individually and as successor No. 20-55989 in interest to Cynthia Ray, deceased; et al., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:19-cv-04922-DSF-MAA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 19, 2021** Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN, OWENS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs Ricky Ray, Morgan Howard, Alexis Grimm, Kourtnee Grimm, and
J.R. (collectively, the “Ray Family”) appeal from the district court’s summary
judgment in favor of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Company (“State Farm”) in the Ray Family’s…