Cesar Caixon Raxtun v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202120-71226California499 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

OCT 21 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR AUGUSTO CAIXON RAXTUN, No. 20-71226

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-322-026

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Augusto Caixon Raxtun, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his

motion to terminate and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s

decision denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.