In re M.S.
Opinion
Opinion
Chou, J.
BACKGROUND
M.S. and J.G. attended the same high school. Their relationship, although limited, was acrimonious. In early January 2020 they argued during class and J.G. hit M.S. with a “small reading book.” J.G. was suspended for two days. About a month later the two had another confrontation. J.G. had just finished a P.E. class and discovered his backpack was gone. M.S. was nearby, “hanging out hiding in the bushes with her friends.” J.G. accused her of taking the backpack. She responded, “[b]itch, you think I got your backpack, go away,” and hung around calling J.G. names while he and a friend searched for it. J.G. told her to “back off” or he would “pull the book on her again,” and then held up a book (in fact, the sequel to the book that figured in their previous altercation). M.S. pulled a pink rectangular device with two protruding antennas out of her bag, turned it on, and said “[t]ry that again, I’m going to tase you in the dick.” A spark erupted from the device when M.S. turned it on. J.G. thought the device was a taser, “panicked a bit,” and retreated. When the principal learned of the incident he summoned M.S. to his office and asked if she had the device with her. M.S.…