Michael Hill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 202120-16305California751 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL HILL, No. 20-16305

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01350-MMD-BNW v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; U.S. MEMORANDUM*

BANK, N.A.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

MTC FINANCIAL, INC., DBA Trustee Corps,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 20, 2021** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: WATFORD and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,*** International Trade Judge.

Michael Hill’s home was sold at a foreclosure sale after he failed to make any

payments on a home loan for four-and-a-half years. Hill then sued U.S. Bank, which

held the deed of trust, and Wells Fargo Bank, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.