Onhir

Eugene Daw v. Onhir

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 202120-17261California1,327 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EUGENE DAW, No. 20-17261

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-08212-SMB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN

RELOCATION, an Administrative Agency of the United States,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 20, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BERMAN,*** District Judge.

Eugene Daw appeals from the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (“ONHIR”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.