Onhir
Eugene Daw v. Onhir
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 202120-17261California1,327 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EUGENE DAW, No. 20-17261
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-08212-SMB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN
RELOCATION, an Administrative Agency of the United States,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 20, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BERMAN,*** District Judge.
Eugene Daw appeals from the district court’s order granting summary
judgment in favor of the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (“ONHIR”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York,…